Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/201786
Authors: 
Crawford, Rowena
Johnson, Paul
Zaranko, Ben
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
IFS Report R147
Abstract: 
The last 25 years have seen two periods of public expenditure restraint in the UK (the 1990s and the 2010s) and one period of increased spending (between 2000 and 2010). Over that whole time, the Treasury has been responsible for controlling government spending, setting fiscal rules and the overall control framework, and ensuring that other departments stay within their spending limits. In this report, we use data on spending plans and out-turns to see what they can tell us about the efficacy of spending control under different regimes. As well as different fiscal environments, and consequently different overall fiscal rules, over the periods there have also been different measures and targets for spending. During the 1990s, the then Conservative government was aiming to reduce public spending as a fraction of national income, and was targeting for control a measure of public spending dubbed the 'new control total'. This covered around 85% of public spending, including local authority spending and 'non-cyclical' social security spending, on pensions for example. It excluded the more cyclical elements of social security and debt interest payments. [...]
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-1-912805-04-4
Document Type: 
Research Report

Files in This Item:
File
Size
861.03 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.