Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/200709
Authors: 
Dobbelstein, Thomas
Year of Publication: 
2018
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Applied Leadership and Management [ISSN:] 2194-9522 [Volume:] 6 [Year:] 2018 [Issue:] [Pages:] 34-46
Abstract: 
Research questions: To what extent does the operationalisation of the Leadership Productivity Model fulfill the approved scientific quality criteria? Methods: After identifying suitable quality criteria, they were evaluated based on 1,267 questionnaires following the Leadership Productivity Survey (LPS). Dimensions as well as their criteria evaluated by applying e.g. Cronbach's Alpha, item difficulty index, correlation and factor analysis. Results: Apart from very few limitations objectivity is good. Reliability for the en-tire LPS is excellent; the reliability coefficients for each dimension are good. Criterion validity is confirmed, construct validity cannot be con-firmed by Pearson's correlation coefficients, but partly by factor analysis. Summing up the LPS is an objective, completely reliable and partially valid instrument.
Document Type: 
Article
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
250.26 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.