Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/193424 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2019
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] IZA World of Labor [ISSN:] 2054-9571 [Article No.:] 149v2 [Publisher:] Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) [Place:] Bonn [Year:] 2019
Verlag: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
Measures of individual happiness, or well-being, can guide labor market policies. Individual unemployment, as well as the rate of unemployment in society, have a negative effect on happiness. In contrast, employment protection and un-employment benefits or a basic income can contribute to happiness—though when such policies prolong unintended unemployment, the net effect on national happiness is negative. Active labor market policies that create more job opportunities increase happiness, which in turn increases productivity. Measures of individual happiness should therefore guide labor market policy more explicitly, also with substantial robotization in production.
Schlagwörter: 
happiness
well-being
employment protection
wage-income distribution
robotization
JEL: 
D31
J21
J28
J31
J64
J83
Z18
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
308.47 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.