Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/189758 
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
cemmap working paper No. CWP39/17
Publisher: 
Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice (cemmap), London
Abstract: 
Statistical models of unobserved heterogeneity are typically formalized as mixtures of simple parametric models and interest naturally focuses on testing for homogeneity versus general mixture alternatives. Many tests of this type can be interpreted as C(») tests, as in Neyman (1959), and shown to be locally, asymptotically optimal. These C(») tests will be contrasted with a new approach to likelihood ratio testing for general mixture models. The latter tests are based on estimation of general nonparametric mixing distribution with the Kiefer and Wolfowitz (1956) maximum likelihood estimator. Recent developments in convex optimization have dramatically improved upon earlier EM methods for computation of these estimators, and recent results on the large sample behavior of likelihood ratios involving such estimators yield a tractable form of asymptotic inference. Improvement in computation efficiency also facilitates the use of a bootstrap method to determine critical values that are shown to work better than the asymptotic critical values in fi nite samples. Consistency of the bootstrap procedure is also formally established. We compare performance of the two approaches identifying circumstances in which each is preferred.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
582.59 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.