Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/185586
Authors: 
Förster, Manuel
van der Weele, Joël J.
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. TI 2018-067/I
Abstract: 
We experimentally investigate strategic communication about the impact of prosocial actions, which is central to policy debates about foreign aid or the environment. In our experiment, a “sender” receives an informative but noisy signal about the impact of a charitable donation. She then sends a message to a “receiver”, upon which both subjects choose whether to donate. The sender faces a trade-off between persuading the receiver to act and justifying her own inaction. We find evidence for both motives. Increasing the visibility of the sender’s actions increases the justification motive and makes senders more likely to report low impact, reducing giving among receivers. These results show the intimate links between reputation and com- munication in moral domains, and help understand the fraught nature of political discussions about social impact.
Subjects: 
cheap talk
image concerns
information aggregation
charitable giving
economic experiments
JEL: 
C91
D83
D91
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.7 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.