Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/177171 
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 11367
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Online reviews are a powerful means of propagating the reputations of products, services, and even employers. However, existing research suggests that online reviews often suffer from selection bias – people with extreme opinions are more motivated to share them than people with moderate opinions, resulting in biased distributions of reviews. Providing incentives for reviewing has the potential to reduce this selection bias, because incentives can mitigate the motivational deficit of people who hold moderate opinions. Using data from one of the leading employer review companies, Glassdoor, we show that voluntary reviews have a different distribution from incentivized reviews. The likely bias in the distribution of voluntary reviews can affect workers' choice of employers, because it changes the ranking of industries by average employee satisfaction. Because observational data from Glassdoor are not able to provide a measure of the true distribution of employer reviews, we complement our investigation with a randomized controlled experiment on MTurk. We find that when participants' decision to review their employer is voluntary, the resulting distribution of reviews differs from the distribution of forced reviews. Moreover, providing relatively high monetary rewards or a pro-social cue as incentives for reviewing reduces this bias. We conclude that while voluntary employer reviews often suffer from selection bias, incentives can significantly reduce bias and help workers make more informed employer choices.
Subjects: 
employer reviews
bias
incentives
JEL: 
J2
J28
L14
L86
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
675.62 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.