Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/176829 
Year of Publication: 
2017
Citation: 
[Journal:] Central Asian Survey [ISSN:] 1465-3354 [Volume:] 36 [Issue:] 4 [Publisher:] Routledge [Place:] Abingdon [u.a.] [Year:] 2017 [Pages:] 430-452
Publisher: 
Routledge, Abingdon [u.a.]
Abstract: 
What would a ‘good’ industrial policy in the realm of cotton production look like? This article seeks to address this question through a focus on reforms to the cotton sector in Kazakhstan. In contrast with neighbouring Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, administrators in Kazakhstan had widely freed the cotton sector from government control as early as 1998. Agricultural collectives had been replaced by small private farms, and commercial cotton processors and traders entered the sector. However, in 2007, regulation tightened again and forced ginneries to use a complex warehouse receipt system without making sure that it was accepted by stakeholders and without appropriate institutions for implementing it in place. Moreover, it imposed financing restrictions on ginneries, which were major loan and input providers to farmers. In the following years, private producers and investors turned away from cotton, and cotton area and output fell substantially. We position our analysis in the broader debate about the right approach to industrial policy and argue that the cotton sector performance after 2007 shows how ill-designed regulation and government interference can turn a promising economic sector towards decline.
Subjects: 
cotton
Kazakhstan
public regulation
industrial policy
commodity finance
JEL: 
O13
O25
P23
Q15
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
URL of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.