Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/176383
Authors: 
Avis, Eric
do Amaral, Claudio A. Ferraz
Finan, Frederico S.
Varjão, Carlos
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
Texto para discussão 656
Abstract: 
This paper examines the effects of campaign spending limits on political competition and incumbency advantage. We study a reform in Brazil that imposed limits on campaign spending for mayoral elections. These limits were implemented with a discontinuous kink which we exploit for causal identification. We find that stricter limits increase political competition by creating a larger pool of candidates that is on average less wealthy. Moreover, we find that stricter spending limits reduce the incumbency advantage, causing mayors to be less likely to be reelected. These findings are consistent with a contest model with spending caps and endogenous candidate entry.
Subjects: 
Political Entry
Political Selection
Campaign Spending
Campaign Contributions
Incumbency Advantage
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.58 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.