Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/173778
Authors: 
Essers, Dennis
Ide, Stefaan
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
NBB Working Paper 323
Abstract: 
This paper provides an empirical evaluation of the Flexible Credit Line (FCL), the IMF's prime precautionary lending instrument since 2009 to which so far only three emerging market economies have subscribed: Mexico, Colombia and Poland. We consider both questions of selectivity and effectiveness: first, which factors explain the three FCL countries' participation in such arrangements? And second, to which extent have the FCL arrangements delivered on their promise of boosting market confidence in their respective users? Based on a probit analysis we show that FCL selectivity can be explained by both demand- and supply-side factors. The probability of participation in the FCL was greater in countries that experienced larger exchange market pressures prior to the creation of the instrument, that had lower bond spreads and inflation, that accounted for higher shares in US exports, and that exhibited a higher propensity of making political concessions to the US. Our estimation of the effects of the FCL employs the 'synthetic control' methodology, a novel counterfactual approach. We find evidence for some but not spectacular beneficial effects on sovereign bond spreads and gross capital inflows in FCL countries. Overall, our results suggest that any economic stigma eligible countries still attach to entry into an FCL arrangement is unwarranted. Conversely, the apparent link of FCL participation with US interests may not be conducive to overcoming political stigma.
Subjects: 
Flexible Credit Line
IMF
global financial safety net
emerging markets
synthetic control
JEL: 
F33
F34
F55
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.47 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.