Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Ashley, Richard A.
Sun, Xiaojin
Year of Publication: 
[Journal:] Econometrics [ISSN:] 2225-1146 [Volume:] 4 [Year:] 2016 [Issue:] 4 [Pages:] 1-13
The two-step GMM estimators of Arellano and Bond (1991) and Blundell and Bond (1998) for dynamic panel data models have been widely used in empirical work; however, neither of them performs well in small samples with weak instruments. The continuous-updating GMM estimator proposed by Hansen, Heaton, and Yaron (1996) is in principle able to reduce the small-sample bias, but it involves high-dimensional optimizations when the number of regressors is large. This paper proposes a computationally feasible variation on these standard two-step GMM estimators by applying the idea of continuous-updating to the autoregressive parameter only, given the fact that the absolute value of the autoregressive parameter is less than unity as a necessary requirement for the data-generating process to be stationary. We show that our subset-continuous-updating method does not alter the asymptotic distribution of the two-step GMM estimators, and it therefore retains consistency. Our simulation results indicate that the subset-continuous-updating GMM estimators outperform their standard two-step counterparts in finite samples in terms of the estimation accuracy on the autoregressive parameter and the size of the Sargan-Hansen test.
dynamic panel data models
Arellano-Bond GMM estimator
Blundell-Bond GMM estimator
subset-continuous-updating GMM estimators
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License:
Document Type: 

Files in This Item:
762.63 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.