Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/170931 
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 10947
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Recent work suggests that women are more responsive to negative feedback than men in certain environments. We examine whether negative feedback in the form of relatively low grades in major-related classes explains gender differences in the final majors undergraduates choose. We use unique administrative data from a large private university on the East Coast from 2009-2016 to test whether women are more sensitive to grades than men, and whether the gender composition of major-related classes affects major changes. We also control for other factors that may affect a student's final major including: high school student performance, gender of faculty, and economic returns of majors. Finally, we examine how students' decisions are affected by external cues that signal STEM fields as masculine. The results show that high school academic preparation, faculty gender composition, and major returns have little effect on major switching behaviors, and that women and men are equally likely to change their major in response to poor grades in major-related courses. Moreover, women in male-dominated majors do not exhibit different patterns of switching behaviors relative to their male colleagues. Women are, however, more likely to switch out of male-dominated STEM majors in response to poor performance compared to men. Therefore, we find that it takes multiple signals of lack of fit into a major (low grades, gender composition of class, and external stereotyping signals) to impel female students to switch majors.
Subjects: 
education gender gap
major choice
STEM field
JEL: 
I23
I24
I26
J16
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
440.07 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.