Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Kwong, Koon-Shing
Tse, Yiu-Kuen
Chan, Wai-Sum
Year of Publication: 
[Journal:] Risks [ISSN:] 2227-9091 [Volume:] 5 [Year:] 2017 [Issue:] 2 [Pages:] 1-17
Building a social security system to ensure Singapore residents have peace of mind in funding for retirement has been at the top of Singapore government's policy agenda over the last decade. Implementation of the Lifelong Income For the Elderly (LIFE) scheme in 2009 clearly shows that the government spares no effort in improving its pension scheme to boost its residents' income after retirement. Despite the recent modifications to the LIFE scheme, Singapore residents must still choose between two plans: the Standard and Basic plans. To enhance the flexibility of the LIFE scheme with further streamlining of its fund management, we propose some plan modifications such that scheme members do not face a dichotomy of plan choices. Instead, they select two age parameters: the Payout Age and the Life-annuity Age. This paper discusses the actuarial analysis for determining members' payouts and bequests based on the proposed age parameters. We analyze the net cash receipts and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for various plan-parameter configurations. This information helps members make their plan choices. To address cost-of-living increases we propose to extend the plan to accommodate an annual step-up of monthly payouts. By deferring the Payout Age from 65 to 68, members can enjoy an annual increase of about 2% of the payouts for the same first-year monthly benefits.
inflation risk
investment returns
life annuity
longevity risk
post-retirement benefits
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License:
Document Type: 
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
564.72 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.