Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/162954 
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper Series No. 611
Publisher: 
University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics, Heidelberg
Abstract: 
We propose an imperfect information model for the expectations of macroeconomic forecasters that explains differences in average disagreement levels across forecasters by means of cross sectional heterogeneity in the variance of private noise signals. We show that the forecaster-specific signal-to-noise ratios determine both the average individual disagreement level and an individuals' forecast performance: forecasters with very noisy signals deviate strongly from the average forecasts and report forecasts with low accuracy. We take the model to the data by empirically testing for this implied correlation. Evidence based on data from the Surveys of Professional Forecasters for the US and for the Euro Area supports the model for short- and medium-run forecasts but rejects it based on its implications for long-run forecasts.
Subjects: 
disagreement
expectations
imperfect information
signal-to-noise ratio
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
617.53 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.