Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/157802
Authors: 
Cockshott, Paul
Cottrell, Allin
Valle Baeza, Alejandro
Year of Publication: 
2014
Citation: 
[Journal:] Investigación Económica [Volume:] LXXIII [Issue:] 287 [Pages:] 115-134
Abstract: 
The labor theory of value, originated in the classics and reformulated by Marx, has found support in numerous empirical works during the last thirty years. In many economies, sectors in monetary terms are highly correlated with them in terms of labor values. In his book Capital as Power (2009), and in a subsequent discussion online, Jonathan Nitzan and Shimshon Bichler argue that such results are invalid because the calculations do not use labor value variables but two monetary variables are correlated. Nitzan and Bichler also argue that are spurious correlations by the presence of a third variable. This article refutes both critics and consequently reinforces the empirical support for the theory of labor value. [For the original exchange, see: "Testing the Labour Theory of Value: An Exchange" here: http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/308/]
Subjects: 
empirical verification and Marxist theory
labour theory of value
spurious correlation
URL of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.