Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149990
Authors: 
Grames, Johanna
Grass, Dieter
Kort, Peter M.
Fürnkranz-Prskawetz, Alexia
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
ECON WPS - Vienna University of Technology Working Papers in Economic Theory and Policy 01/2017
Abstract: 
Flooding events can affect businesses close to rivers, lakes or coasts. This paper provides a partial equilibrium model which helps to understand the optimal location choice for a firm in flood risk areas and its investment strategies. How often, when and how much are firms willing to invest in flood risk protection measures? We apply Impulse Control Theory and develop a continuation algorithm to solve the model numerically. We find that, the higher the flood risk and the more the firm values the future, i.e. the more sustainable the firm plans, the more the firm will invest in ood defense. Investmentsin productive capital follow a similar path. Hence, planning in a sustainable way leads to economic growth. Sociohydrological feedbacks are crucial for the location choice of the firm, whereas different economic settings have an impact on investment strategies. If flood defense is already present, e.g. built up by the government, firms move closer to the water and invest less in flood defense, which allows firms to accrue higher expected profits. Firms with a large initial productive capital surprisingly try not to keep their market advantage, but rather reduce flood risk by reducing exposed productive capital.
Subjects: 
optimal investment
location choice
flood
socio-hydrology
Impulse Control Theory
sustainability
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.