Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/148452 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2016
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] IZA World of Labor [ISSN:] 2054-9571 [Article No.:] 227 [Publisher:] Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) [Place:] Bonn [Year:] 2016
Verlag: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
Around nine countries currently use a national income contingent loan (ICL) scheme for higher education tuition using the income tax system. Increased international interest in ICL validates an examination of its costs and benefits relative to the traditional financing system, government-guaranteed bank loans (GGBLs). Bank-type loans exhibit poor economic characteristics: namely, repayment hardships for the disadvantaged, and default. This damages credit reputations and can be associated with high taxpayer subsidies. ICLs avoid these problems, but effective collection of debt requires a sophisticated mechanism.
Schlagwörter: 
income contingent loans
government-guaranteed bank loans
consumption smoothing
default insurance
repayment burdens
JEL: 
I20
I21
I22
I23
I28
H42
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
820.21 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.