Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/146189
Authors: 
Zharova, Alona
Mihoci, Andrija
Härdle, Wolfgang Karl
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
SFB 649 Discussion Paper 2016-020
Abstract: 
Publications are a vital element of any scientist's career. It is not only the number of media outlets but aslo the quality of published research that enters decisions on jobs, salary, tenure, etc. Academic ranking scales in economics and other disciplines are, therefore, widely used in classification, judgment and scientific depth of individual research. These ranking systems are competing, allow for different disciplinary gravity and sometimes give orthogonal results. Here a statistical analysis of the interconnection between Handelsblatt (HB), Research Papers in Economics (RePEc, here RP) and Google Scholar (GS) systems is presented. Quantile regression allows us to successfully predict missing ranking data and to obtain a so-called HB Common Score and to carry out a cross-rankings analysis. Based on the merged ranking data from different data providers, we discuss the ranking systems dependence, analyze the age effect and study the relationship between the research expertise areas and the ranking performance.
Subjects: 
scientometrics
ranking
quantile regression
Handelsblatt
RePEc
Google Scholar
JEL: 
C14
C53
C81
M10
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.