Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/130701
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
Working Papers No. 15-7
Publisher: 
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston, MA
Abstract: 
Share contracts are common in principal-agent relationships when returns are uncertain and it is costly to measure the agent's contribution. Well-known examples of these types of arrangements include sales commissions for real estate agents, contingency fees for attorneys, and cropshare contracts used in agriculture. An empirical feature of these contracts is that the shares specified are often based on focal points or historical norms, and seem excessively uniform given large and observable differences among the contracting parties. Using extensive survey data on cropshare contracts in Illinois, I test the hypothesis that contractual norms have measurable effects on factor returns. I find that tenants on higher-quality farmland capture a sizable portion of the land rent, controlling for nonlabor inputs, differences in labor quality, assortative matching effects, and riskiness in returns. Because the existence of a contractual norm is a valuable form of social capital for the bargaining parties, I argue that these distributional effects do not necessarily imply economic inefficiency.
Subjects: 
norms
share contracts
conformity
focal points
JEL: 
D01
D02
D33
Q15
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
355.92 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.