Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/128130
Authors: 
Copestake, James
Remnant, Fiona
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing 35
Abstract: 
This paper contributes to the literature on qualitative approaches to impact evaluation, particularly in complex contexts. It reports on substantive and methodological findings from four pilot studies of a protocol for qualitative impact evaluation of NGO sponsored rural development projects in Malawi and Ethiopia. Two of the projects aimed to build resilience to climate change through support for a spectrum of livelihood diversification activities, while two focused on smallholder involvement in the value chains of specific cash crops. The protocol was designed and tested through action research with the aim of generating evidence in a credible, timely and cost-effective way to confirm the causal theories underpinning project actions, as well as to explore incidental sources of change and unanticipated effects. The paper describes the methodology, provides an overview of findings and reflects on lessons learnt in addressing problems of attribution, onfirmation bias and generalizability. It suggests scope for further development of responses to these issues based on self-reported attribution, partial blinding of respondents and nesting qualitative evaluation in quantitative monitoring.
Subjects: 
Impact evaluation
qualitative methods
food security
climate change adaptation
rural livelihoods
Malawi
Ethiopia
NGOs
confirmation bias
mixed methods
attribution
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.16 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.