Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/102022
Authors: 
Cian, Enrica De
Keppo, Ilkka
Bollen, Johannes
Carrara, Samuel
Förster, Hannah
Hübler, Michael
Kanudia, Amit
Paltsev, Sergey
Sands, Ronald
Schumacher, Katja
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
Nota di Lavoro, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei 30.2014
Abstract: 
This paper examines how changes in an international climate regime would affect the European decarbonization strategy and costs through the mechanisms of trade, technology, and innovation. We present the results from the Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) model comparison study on European climate policy to 2050. Moving from a no-policy scenario to an existing-policies case reduces all energy imports, on average. Introducing a more stringent climate policy target for the EU only leads to slightly greater global emission reductions. Consumers and producers in Europe bear most of the additional burden and inevitably face some economic losses. More ambitious mitigation action outside Europe, especially when paired with a well-operating global carbon market, could reduce the burden for Europe significantly. Because of global learning, the costs of wind and especially solar-PV in Europe would decline below the levels observed in the existing-policy case and increased R&D spending outside the EU would leverage EU R&D investments as well.
Subjects: 
Climate Change
Stabilization Policy
International Participation
JEL: 
Q5
Q54
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.