Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/47506 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
IFS Working Papers No. 10,17
Publisher: 
Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
Abstract: 
We examine the effect of large cash transfers on the consumption of food by poor households in rural Mexico. The transfers represent 20% of household income on average, and yet, the budget share of food is unchanged following receipt of this money. This is an important puzzle to solve, particularly so in the context of a social welfare programme designed in part to improve nutrition of individuals in the poorest households. We estimate an Engel curve for food. We rule out price increases, changes in the quality of food consumed and homotheticity of preferences as explanations for this puzzle. We also show that food is a necessity, with a strong negative effect of income on the food budget share. The decrease in food budget share caused by the large increase in income is cancelled by some other relevant aspect of the programme so that the net effect is nil. We argue that the program has not changed preferences and that there is no labelling of money. We propose that the key to the puzzle resides in the fact that the transfer is put in the hands of women and that the change in control over household resources is what leads to the observed changes in behaviour.
Subjects: 
demand
conditional cash transfer
Engel curves
income elasticities
QUAIDS
food
nutrition
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
324.12 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.