Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/35448
Authors: 
van Ommeren, Jos
Russo, Giovanni
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
IZA discussion papers 4008
Abstract: 
In the extensive job search literature, studies assume either sequential or non-sequential search. Which assumption is more reasonable? This paper introduces a novel method to test the hypothesis that firms search sequentially based on the relationship between the number of (rejected) job applicants and the number of employees hired. We use data compiled from filled vacancies for the Netherlands. Different types of search methods are distinguished. Our results imply that when firms use advertising, private or public employment agencies, which together cover about 45 percent of filled vacancies, sequential search is rejected. For about 55 percent of filled vacancies however, sequential search cannot be rejected. In line with theoretical considerations, when firms use search methods that rely on social networks, sequential search cannot be rejected.
Subjects: 
Sequential search
recruitment
JEL: 
J63
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
635.88 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.