Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/35025
Authors: 
Bassanini, Andrea
Nunziata, Luca
Venn, Danielle
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 3555
Abstract: 
This paper examines the impact of employment protection legislation on productivity in the OECD, using annual cross-country aggregate data on the degree of regulations and industry-level data on productivity from 1982 to 2003. We adopt a difference-in-differences framework, which exploits likely differences in the productivity effect of dismissal regulations in different industries. Our identifying assumption is that stricter employment protection influences worker or firm behaviour, and thereby productivity, more in industries where the policy is likely to be binding than in other industries. The advantage of this approach is that, in contrast with standard cross-country analysis, we can control for unobserved factors that, on average, are likely to have the same effect on productivity in all industries. Our empirical results suggest that mandatory dismissal regulations have a depressing impact on productivity growth in industries where layoff restrictions are more likely to be binding. We present a large battery of robustness checks, including dealing with endogeneity issues, that suggest that our finding is robust.
Subjects: 
Productivity
EPL
labour market institutions
difference-in-differences
JEL: 
J08
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
475.98 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.