Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/20874 
Year of Publication: 
1999
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 35
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Documenting trends in job stability over the past twenty-five years has become a controversial exercise. The two main sources of information on employer tenure, the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) and the Current Population Survey (CPS), have generally given different pictures of the degree of job stability in the U.S. economy. This paper examines whether the PSID and CPS yield systematically different results with respect to comparable measures of job stability. Both data sets show an increase in the fraction of male workers aged 30 and over with tenure less than ten years beginning in the late 1980s. There is little evidence in either data set of a trend in the share of employed individuals with one year or less of tenure. The two data sets provide nearly identical results for the 1980s and 90s while in the 1970s they give results that are somewhat less comparable. We argue that this is probably the result of changes in the CPS tenure question following the 1981 survey. The effects of this change and the choice of ending year and variable definition in PSID-based studies are the most likely explanations for the disparate findings in the literature.
Subjects: 
Job stability
U.S economy
JEL: 
J63
J23
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
176.42 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.