Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/91299
Authors: 
de Oliveira, Luis Felipe Batista
Soares, Sergei S. D.
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Texto para Discussão, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA) 1738
Abstract (Translated): 
Arguments against means-tested cash transfers for the poor based upon labor supply appear both in the specialized literature and in the media. It is possible to make a microeconomic argument pointing to a reduction in labor supply on the part of beneficiaries of a targeted cash transfer. This would lead people giving up looking for a job, with long-term consequences for their human capital and social networks. This text reviews (we hope) all the studies made on this issue in Brazil since Cash Transfers have become important. The results are clear: with the exception of specific demographic groups such as women with children, either there are no labor disincentive effects at all or they are very small.
Subjects: 
conditional cash transfers
labor supply
labor incentives
time allocation
JEL: 
I38
J22
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
658.48 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.