Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Subramanian, Saravanan V.
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
ZEF Working Paper Series 46
The current debate on decentralisation offers a partial and polarised view on the sharing of power to manage water. Drawing New Institutionalism as applied in the social and ecological sciences, the paper argues that decentralisation represents a complex adaptive process, wherein agents draw upon the activities of multiple actors and their rules to negotiate and renegotiate their unequal power relations. Examining a watershed in the Indian Himalayas as a case study, the paper demonstrates the incremental and cumulative integration of statutory and socially-embedded rules in facilitating the agents' negotiation process. It reveals the cunning and adaptive behaviour of the agents to decentralise water resource management. The paper argues that though the contemporary decentralised reforms offered opportunities for these agents to negotiate, they do not ensure resource use efficiency, equity, accountability and participation of stakeholders in management of water. The paper identifies the significance of authority, information, scope and pay-off rules to facilitate decentralisation reforms. It recommends the conventional state-centric regulation to strengthen these rules for more informed management of water resources.
institutional analysis
institutional change
power dynamics
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
333.43 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.