Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/88324 
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
ZEF Working Paper Series No. 1
Publisher: 
University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF), Bonn
Abstract: 
The production, dissemination and utilisation of knowledge are essential for development and the introduction of information and communication technology (ICT) is a precondition for developing a knowledge society. Countries, regions and populations are, however, divided, in terms of access to ICT. Socio-economic indicators on Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, the Netherlands and Germany are used to show that the existing global digital divide and the knowledge gap are widening between developing countries and the industrial countries and within individual nations. Some Southeast Asian countries have embarked on an ambitious plan to close the digital divide and to use knowledge as a base for economic development, by-passing earlier stages of industrialisation. Some commentators have, in contrast, asserted that it is doubtful that closing the digital divide will let developing countries leapfrog to higher levels of development as the knowledge economy will deepen the digital divide between regions and populations and actually expand the gap between rich and poor. The paper discusses this controversy by arguing that global knowledge has to be localized and local knowledge utilized in developing a knowledge society. If it seems unlikely that the digital gap between ASEAN and developed countries will be closed completely at least narrowing the gap at the lower end should be targeted. Statistical data on the global absorption of locally produced knowledge are used to measure the way towards a knowledge society. Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia and the Philippines have relatively high local social science output, whereas Indonesia, Cambodia, Vietnam, Myanmar and Laos have low output rates. We diagnose four different paths from 1970 to 2000: Indonesia shows a stable high level of dependence, Malaysia and the Philippines are increasing local output but also increasing dependence, whereas Singapore is increasing output with decreasing dependence on global social science knowledge.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
269.77 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.