Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/88257
Authors: 
Witt, Ulrich
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Papers on Economics and Evolution 1220
Abstract: 
To assess whether and when the equation economic growth = better life holds, it is necessary to understand what human motivations drive the economic growth process. The preference subjectivism of canonical welfare economics is of little help here as it treats the motivations underlying individual behavior as an unexplained black box. The present paper therefore reviews several motivational hypotheses suggested by biology, behavioral science, and cognitive psychology. They point to a strong influence of cognitive and noncognitive learning processes on the underlying motivations or, in economic terminology, the emergence and change of individual preferences. As a consequence, subjective welfare assessments tend to follow a drift process once a certain level of prosperity has been accomplished by economic growth. The normative relevance of the resulting preference relativism is argued to be particularly momentous, if the value basis of normative judgments is extended beyond the welfare criterion to justice and fairness considerations.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
177.85 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.