Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59581
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
DICE Discussion Paper No. 61
Publisher: 
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), Düsseldorf
Abstract: 
This paper analyzes vertical integration incentives in a bilaterally duopolistic industry where upstream producers bargain with downstream retailers on terms of supply. In the applied framework integration does not affect the total output produced, but it affects the distribution of rents among players. Vertical integration incentives depend on the strength of substitutability or complementarity between products and the shape of the unit cost function. I demonstrate furthermore that in contrast to the widely prevailing view in competition policy, vertical integration can under particular circumstances convey more bargaining power to the merged entity than a horizontal merger to monopoly. The model is applied to analyze strategic merger incentives to influence entry decisions. Mergers can facilitate and deter entry. While horizontal mergers to deter entry are never profitable, firms on different market levels may strategically choose to integrate vertically to keep a potential entrant out of the market. I provide conditions for such entry-deterring vertical mergers to occur.
Subjects: 
Bargaining
Vertical Mergers
Entry
JEL: 
L13
L22
L42
ISBN: 
978-3-86304-060-4
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
388.69 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.