Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57561
Authors: 
Hausman, Daniel M.
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
Papers on economics and evolution 1124
Abstract: 
Contemporary mainstream normative economists assess policies in terms of their capacities to satisfy preferences, though most would concede that other factors such as freedom, rights, and justice are also relevant. Why should policy be responsive to preferences? This essay argues that the best reason is that people's preferences are in some circumstances good evidence of what will benefit them. When those circumstances do not obtain and preferences are not good evidence of welfare, there is little reason to satisfy preferences.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
634.98 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.