Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Moldaschl, Manfred
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 9/2010
In this paper I argue that it makes no sense to have "innovation theories", or the use of the concept in describing the potential of social and economic theories to explain the phenomenon of non-equilibrium. If we wish to explain dynamic, change, evolution, revolution, etc. in socio-economic systems, then theories that are genuinely capable of doing so are indispensable. We don't need static theories of society, economy, organization, the firm, etc. which need an "additional" theory of incongruence and dynamics as an exception. In this context, the recent boom of literature on "social innovation" seems to be particularly questionable. It presents itself with the attitude of opening, broadening, or intellectually "freeing" the discourse of innovation from its technological insularity. That might be interpreted as opportunism since the idea of "innovation" generates an abundance of attention and approval so that any matter of concern can be legitimated and ennobled by the simple use of the word. Therefore, my paper begins with a short history of the category which has never been restricted to techno semantics.
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:


Files in This Item:

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.