Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50161
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnthoff, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorTol, Richard S. J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-16en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-30T10:01:17Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-30T10:01:17Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/50161-
dc.description.abstractWe use the integrated assessment model FUND to compute the income elasticities of climate change impacts for different world regions over time. We find limited support for Schelling's Conjecture that development might be the best defense against climate change impacts, and for the idea that the impacts from climate change might be akin to a luxury good. For very poor regions, an increase in income in the short run is an effective tool to reduce impacts from climate change by making those societies less vulnerable, in particular to infectious diseases. While net climate impacts appear to be akin to a luxury good for some countries at specific times, that effect disappears in the long run as impacts from agriculture make up a large share of total impacts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aESRI |cDublinen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aESRI working paper |x390en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleSchelling's conjecture on climate and development: A testen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn662314336en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
756.82 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.