Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/49932 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuchlinski, Elkeen
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-26-
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-27T16:12:47Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-27T16:12:47Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/49932-
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides textual evidence of Keynes's position on monetary policy and shaping international monetary relations. One result of my contribution is that the famous dichotomy rules versus discretion is of no relevance to his economic theory, because he used the term rules not in the meaning of a formal brilliantly designed notion.He definitely made a distinction between non-rigidly-fixed-rules and discretion. I give an explanation why his economic theory is not compatible with principles of constructivism, empiricism and ontological realism by referring to a key term of his economic writings, i.e., discretionary decision.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aFreie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaft |cBerlinen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDiskussionsbeiträge |x2003/2en
dc.subject.jelB22en
dc.subject.jelB4en
dc.subject.jelE58en
dc.subject.jelF33en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordHistory of economic thought since 1925en
dc.subject.keywordMethodologyen
dc.subject.keywordCentral Bankingen
dc.subject.keywordInernational monetary arrangements and instititionsen
dc.titleAgainst rigid rules: Keynes's economic theory-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn668824190en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:fubsbe:20032en

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.