Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41069
Year of Publication: 
2004
Series/Report no.: 
Diskussionsbeiträge No. 120
Publisher: 
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Volkswirtschaftliches Seminar, Göttingen
Abstract: 
In this paper we analyze the political economics of different strategies to implement revenue neutral reforms of a complicated income tax system ('tax-cut-cum-base-broadening'). We set up a straightforward social choice model where individuals initially have two deduction possibilities from the tax base. The government wants to cut back the tax base exemptions and it can do so symmetrically or asymmetrically. Asymmetrical approaches face the difficulty that even such individuals can vote against an isolated cut (or an abolishment) of a single tax concession who benefit below average from it. In some constellations a symmetrical cut is in fact the only politically feasible option, whereas all asymmetrical reforms would not be supported by the public.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
221.22 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.