Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/343409 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Editor:] Gadžo, Amra [Editor:] Klapić, Hidajet [Conference:] 9th Scientific Conference with International Participation "Economy of Integration" (ICEI 2025) [Title:] Regenerative and Digital Economy: Southeastern Europe's Path to Sustainable Competitiveness [Series:] 9th Scientific Conference with International Participation ''Economy of Integration'' (ICEI 2025) - Conference Proceedings [URL:] http://icei.ba/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Ver-7-ICEI2025_Zbornik-radova_KONACNA-VERZIJA_slanje.pdf [Publisher:] University of Tuzla Faculty of Economics [Place:] Tuzla [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 263-276
Publisher: 
University of Tuzla Faculty of Economics, Tuzla
Abstract: 
The aim of this study is to explore how Swedish sustainability reports can serve as a reference point for Bosnia and Herzegovina in building a more coherent and comparable reporting system. This study focuses on sustainability reports from Swedish listed companies aligned with the CSRD as a benchmark for Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2024. By conducting a comparative and content analysis highlight how the structured and detailed form of Swedish reports can inform the development of BiH's practices, which at present lack consistency and formalization. The findings suggest that implementing the CSRD could accelerate BiH's transition toward systematic and internationally comparable reporting. The paper concludes on how Swedish experiences and reporting practices can be adapted to the Bosnian context. The findings indicate that Swedish reports are characterized by a high degree of standardization, sectoral comparability, and integration with European sustainability frameworks, while Bosnian reports show inconsistency and limited stakeholder orientation. The study concludes that gradual adoption of the CSRD, accompanied by institutional support and sector-specific guidelines, could accelerate Bosnia and Herzegovina's transition toward systematic, transparent, and internationally comparable reporting. Swedish experiences thus offer concrete lessons for designing a more coherent sustainability reporting system in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Subjects: 
sustainability reporting
content analysis
corporate sustainability reporting directive
JEL: 
M40
M41
URL of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Conference Paper
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.