Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/343330 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2026
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research (SBUR) [ISSN:] 2366-6153 [Volume:] 78 [Issue:] 1 [Article No.:] 2 [Year:] 2026 [Pages:] 1-37
Verlag: 
Springer, Heidelberg
Zusammenfassung: 
Business Process Management (BPM) is a pivotal driver of operational excellence and sustained organizational performance. To effectively institutionalize BPM at the enterprise level, organizations must establish a robust BPM governance (BPM-G) that provides structure and guidance for all BPM activities. Despite its recognized importance in industry and academia, there remains a need for a comprehensive conceptualization of BPM-G, particularly concerning its configurational diversity and embedding in the organizational context. In response, we develop a taxonomy of BPM-G based on justificatory knowledge from the literature on BPM and corporate governance, as well as interview data from a diverse set of organizations. We demonstrate and evaluate the taxonomy in three steps, presenting three illustrative cases that showcase the usefulness of the taxonomy for describing and analyzing BPM-G. Based on the evaluated taxonomy as our primary contribution, we then advance a context-aware understanding of BPM-G. We specify the relation between BPM-G and corporate governance as well as process governance, discussing how the design of BPM-G is influenced by the organizational tensions of centralization vs. decentralization and standardization vs. flexibilization.
Schlagwörter: 
Business Process Management Governance
Conceptual Framework
Corporate Governance
Organizational Tensions
Taxonomy Development
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
983.96 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.