Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/342037 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] The European Journal of Health Economics [ISSN:] 1618-7601 [Volume:] 27 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Springer Berlin Heidelberg [Place:] Berlin/Heidelberg [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 757-768
Publisher: 
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin/Heidelberg
Abstract: 
Background International studies have demonstrated hospital-related variations in the outcomes of total hip replacement (THR) based on clinical outcome measures and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). Therefore, this study explored hospital-related variations for THR based on PROs in Germany. Methods We performed a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Patients were recruited in ten high-volume hospitals in Lower Saxony, Germany (11/2019–2/2022). We measured the difference between the preoperative and 6-month postoperative absolute scores using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Therefore, we employed a multifactorial analysis of covariance model with OHS change from baseline as the dependent variable. Results In total, 583 patients (65.54 ± 9.91 years; 62.1% female) were included in our analysis. The unadjusted mean OHS score increased from 21.61 ± 7.63 to 40.75 ± 8.10 points, thus indicating a change of 19.14 ± 9.58 points. Overall, 503 patients (86.3%) experienced a minimal important change (MIC) of at least 9 OHS points from the preoperative period to 6-months postoperative. The adjusted change in OHS points for participating hospitals varied between 13.41 and 17.99 OHS points. We found differences between the top-performing hospital and two hospitals ( p  < 0.05 each); however, those differences were shown to be below the minimal important difference (MID) of at least 5.22 OHS points. Conclusions We identified differences in the quality of care for THR among high-volume hospitals in Germany; however, those differences were below the MID threshold. Furthermore, both higher preoperative OHS scores and lower rates of pain relief usage was associated with lower change scores. We recommend studies to explore hospital-related clinically relevant variation for THR which also include low-volume hospitals and an evaluation of both MIC and MID thresholds in Germany.
Subjects: 
Patient reported outcomes
Minimal important change
Mininmal important difference
Oxford Hip Score
Quality of care
Germany
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Additional Information: 
I14
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.