Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/341816 
Year of Publication: 
2026
Citation: 
[Journal:] Theory and Society [ISSN:] 1573-7853 [Volume:] 55 [Issue:] 2 [Article No.:] 11 [Publisher:] Springer Netherlands [Place:] Dordrecht [Year:] 2026
Publisher: 
Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht
Abstract: 
Elijah Anderson’s seminal work on the “Code of the Street” details how individuals use violence to defend and gain respect in violent neighborhoods. We provide his account with choice-theoretic foundations to derive hypotheses on how individuals’ willingness to use violence depends on their street code beliefs, the strength of provocation, and their exposure to violence in their neighborhoods. Using data from a survey of 10th graders in 46 schools across five neighboring cities in Germany, we examine violent intentions in a neighborhood-based scenario that randomly varied the strength of provocation. To measure the level of violence in respondents’ neighborhoods, we link geo-coded police-recorded data. While provocation strength generally increases violent intentions, adolescents who reject the street code and live in low-violence neighborhoods report no violent intentions even when strongly provoked. Conversely, among adolescents with strong street code beliefs, responses to provocations vary depending on their residential environment.
Subjects: 
Code of the street
Youth violence
Neighborhoods
Rational choice theory
Randomized scenarios
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.