Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/341796 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2026
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Paper No. 2026/4
Verlag: 
Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics, Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
Pathogen-stress and terror-management theories predict that lethal epidemics heighten parochial cooperation. We test this prediction experimentally in two nationally representative U.S. samples surveyed before and at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We compare trust and expected trustworthiness across the two waves in monetarily incentivized trust games involving non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans, and Hispanics. We find significant ingroup favoritism in both waves. However, the aggregate ingroup premium fell by about one-half between waves. This decline was concentrated among left-leaning and White respondents. Conversely, both African Americans and Hispanics displayed significant ingroup bias in both waves. While non-Hispanic Whites tended to reduce their ingroup bias in expected trust-worthiness, the opposite was found for African Americans. Respondents more exposed to COVID-19 displayed higher inter-group trust, altruism and expected trustworthiness than others. These results contradict the hypothesis that lethal epidemics intensify parochialism, also suggesting that the response may be diversified across groups.
Schlagwörter: 
COVID-19
Pandemic
Inter-group Relationships
Parochialism
Ingroup
Outgroup
Discrimination
Prosociality
JEL: 
D01
D63
D91
I14
J15
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.18 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.