Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/339593 
Year of Publication: 
2026
Series/Report no.: 
IEA Discussion Paper No. 148
Publisher: 
Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), London
Abstract: 
* Since the 2008 financial crisis, environmental policy has shifted away from simply managing negative externalities and gradually converged with regular industrial policy. Various 'green deals' have been launched around the world with the aim of achieving a combination of economic and environmental development. * Economists, such as Mariana Mazzucato, have gained traction among European policymakers, arguing that governments should not only focus on correcting potential market failures but should also formulate and finance comprehensive public missions to steer innovation towards proposed solutions and technologies. * In 2020, the European Union launched its Green Deal. Six years later, investments in hydrogen-based projects have collapsed, and electricity prices are twice as high as in the U.S. and China. * The United Kingdom has followed a similar trajectory, with comparable results in terms of declining industrial competitiveness and soaring electricity prices. * So far, the EU Green Deal has proved to be expensive, fragmented and ineffective. However, this does not mean that there are no alternative ways to reconcile economic development with environmental considerations. * The green transition should be guided by market price signals rather than by directional industrial policy. Such a framework could be achieved with a) a uniform and comprehensive emissions trading system that in principle covers the entire economy, and b) technology neutrality on the part of government without sector targets, industry support, or industry-specific subsidies.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.