Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/339160 Autor:innen:
Erscheinungsjahr:
2025
Schriftenreihe/Nr.:
PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2025-35
Verlag:
Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Quezon City
Zusammenfassung:
This study examines the Philippines' progress toward achieving gender equality, disability inclusion, and social inclusion (GEDSI) through an examination of available data on analysis of Goals 5 (Gender Equality) and 10 (Reduced Inequalities) of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) from 2015 to 2025. The research reveals substantial policy achievements alongside critical implementation gaps that undermine transformational potential, with intersecting forms of marginalization creating complex patterns of exclusion that require integrated policy responses. Despite robust legal frameworks including the Magna Carta of Women and Magna Carta for Disabled Persons, significant inequalities persist for women, persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples, and marginalized groups across multiple dimensions of identity and experience. Using descriptive and intersectional analytics, Shapley decomposition, and intersectional analysis, the study combines quantitative data from national surveys with qualitative insights from stakeholder interviews to examine how gender, disability, ethnicity, and geography interact to shape development outcomes. Key findings show notable advances in gender equality indicators but persistent challenges remain for persons with disabilities (12% of population aged 15+, with 15% female prevalence versus 9% male). Multiple identities intersect to create unique disadvantage patterns, with substantial regional disparities. Key findings reveal stark disparities across marginalized groups that demonstrate the inadequacy of single-identity approaches to inclusion. For persons with disabilities, severe disability prevalence varies dramatically by educational attainment, from 39% among those with no formal education (reaching 55% among women compared to 23% among men) to just 6% among college graduates. Ethnic variations are equally pronounced, with Waray speakers experiencing 21% overall disability prevalence, including 31% among women versus 11% among men. Indigenous Peoples (IPs) face compounded disadvantages through intersecting barriers: gender gaps in labor market participation are significantly larger among IPs and Muslim ethnic groups, with Indigenous women's engagement in unpaid family work more than three times higher than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Educational exclusion reflects both ethnic and administrative barriers, as around 20% of Muslim ethnic groups and 10% of IPs lack birth registration, fundamentally limiting access to essential services. About half of Indigenous and Muslim ethnic groups did not progress beyond elementary school, compared to less than one-third among non-Indigenous peoples, while more than half remain concentrated in agriculture compared to 19% of non-IPs. (...)
Schlagwörter:
gender equality
disability inclusion
social inclusion
GEDSI
intersectionality
SDG5
SDG10
persons with disabilities
indigenous peoples
marginalized groups
multiple discrimination
intersectional analysis
statistical invisibility
compound marginalization
gender-responsive budgeting
GAD budget reform
institutional strengthening
legislative harmonization
community-controlled funding
inclusive development
Shapley decomposition
educational exclusion
labor market discrimination
ancestral domain rights
outcome-based budgeting
evidence-based policy
disability inclusion
social inclusion
GEDSI
intersectionality
SDG5
SDG10
persons with disabilities
indigenous peoples
marginalized groups
multiple discrimination
intersectional analysis
statistical invisibility
compound marginalization
gender-responsive budgeting
GAD budget reform
institutional strengthening
legislative harmonization
community-controlled funding
inclusive development
Shapley decomposition
educational exclusion
labor market discrimination
ancestral domain rights
outcome-based budgeting
evidence-based policy
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung:
Dokumentart:
Working Paper
Erscheint in der Sammlung:
Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
Format
Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.