Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/337287 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies: Seonmul yeon'gu (JDQS) [ISSN:] 2713-6647 [Volume:] 33 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 2-22
Publisher: 
Emerald, Leeds
Abstract: 
Purpose - In futures markets, margin trading not only relaxes leverage constraints but also entails the risk of margin calls. Therefore, existing studies provide inconsistent evidence on low-risk anomalies, raising challenges in understanding leverage constraints in futures markets. This study aims to address this gap by focusing on margin call risk. Through bootstrap simulations with historical datasets, we find that margin call risk increases with longer investment horizons regardless of the initial margin, maintenance margin or individual futures volatilities. We also find that investors generally prefer higher leverage but adjust it in response to margin call risks across all futures sectors, leading them to opt for lower leverage for longer holding periods. Thus, while low-risk anomalies demonstrate statistical significance over longer investment horizons, their significance decreases for shorter investment horizons, such as less than six months. Our findings suggest that investors with sufficiently short holding periods are less likely to face leverage constraints in futures markets, especially the commodity, currency and bond futures markets.
Subjects: 
Leverage constraints
Low-risk anomalies
Margin call risk
Margin trading
Optimal leverage ratios
JEL: 
G11
G12
G13
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.