Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/335704 
Year of Publication: 
2005
Citation: 
[Editor:] Nellis, John [Editor:] Birdsall, Nancy [Editor:] Center for Global Development [Title:] Reality Check: The Distributional Impact of Privatization in Developing Countries [ISBN:] 1-933286-00-8 [URL:] https://www.cgdev.org/publication/9781933286006-reality-check-distributional-impact-privatization-developing-countries [Publisher:] Center for Global Development [Place:] Washington, DC [Year:] 2005 [Pages:] 123-177
Publisher: 
Center for Global Development, Washington, DC
Abstract: 
This chapter provides an evidence-based, but necessarily partial, evaluation of Bolivia's 1990s privatization wave, focusing on the country's distinctive capitalization mechanism and the regulatory framework introduced as its complement. It first describes the design of capitalization-where control and 50% of equity in major infrastructure firms was transferred to strategic investors, while roughly 45-50% of shares were assigned to the population through pension-fund mechanisms-and documents the accompanying restructuring of industrial organization and regulation across electricity, hydrocarbons (oil and gas), telecommunications, transportation, and water/sewerage. The chapter then assesses outcomes along two dimensions. On the economic side, it reviews investment, productivity, profitability, and fiscal transfers, concluding that reforms broadly met their core goal of raising investment and-together with regulation-were associated with sizable increases in capacity and output. On the social side, it evaluates labor effects and consumer welfare (access, prices, quality), finding that employment reductions were modest relative to the overall economy and that-especially in urban areas-expanded access to utilities frequently benefited poorer households. While pricing evidence is incomplete, welfare calculations suggest that, except for the Cochabamba water episode, access gains generally outweighed price increases. Finally, it discusses why reforms remained unpopular, emphasizing the macroeconomic slowdown, perceived weaknesses in governance and regulation, oversold expectations, and high-profile failures.
Subjects: 
Capitalization
privatization
regulation
utilities
infrastructure
consumer welfare
access and affordability
distributional impacts
Bolivia
Document Type: 
Book Part
Document Version: 
Manuscript Version (Preprint)
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
739.56 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.