Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/330483 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Citation: 
[Journal:] Essays in Economic & Business History (EEBH) [ISSN:] 2376-9459 [Volume:] 41 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2023 [Pages:] 134-147
Publisher: 
Economic and Business History Society (EBHS), Rockford, MI
Abstract: 
One of the most stimulating debates in economic history over the last two decades has been that surrounding the so-called "Great Divergence", namely precisely when the Asian economies fell behind Europe. To date much of that debate has hinged on real wage data. This article highlights and contextualizes evidence from the extant literature that both offsets and supports the notion that living standards in China, as one key component of the Asian Divergence, were similar to Europe as recently as 1800. The article also identifies where more research is necessary so as to make a more robust judgement in the "Great Divergence" debate. To achieve these aims, the article delves into evidence on taxation, interest rates, market integration, standards of living, joint-stock enterprise, cartography and law and finance. China lies at the center of these arguments, but other Asian economies are observed.
Subjects: 
Great Divergence
China
Taxation
Interest Rates
Indebtedness
Joint-Stock Enterprise
Cartography
Law
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.