Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/324105 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] PSL Quarterly Review [ISSN:] 2037-3643 [Volume:] 77 [Issue:] 309 [Year:] 2024 [Pages:] 127-143
Verlag: 
Associazione Economia civile, Rome
Zusammenfassung: 
This article aims to study the Solow-Pasinetti debate on the aggregate production function and technical progress as an event that anticipated a divide in the subsequent theories of economic growth and technical change. Ultimately, the debate manifests two completely different approaches, not only to the particular question of technical change but also to political economy tout court. Pasinetti gave paramount importance to the fact that the factors of production could not be treated as symmetrical, as the neoclassical theory treated them. Related to this is Pasinetti's dismissal of the distinction neoclassical economics made between shifts in the production function to evaluate technical change and movements along it. In fact, he dismissed the neoclassical production function altogether.
Schlagwörter: 
Pasinetti
production function
productivity measurement
Solow
JEL: 
B22
B41
O40
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
932.5 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.