Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/323993 
Year of Publication: 
2013
Citation: 
[Journal:] Strategic Change [ISSN:] 1099-1697 [Volume:] 22 [Issue:] 1-2 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Hoboken, NJ [Year:] 2013 [Pages:] 17-29
Publisher: 
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Abstract: 
Commercial funding to microfinance institutions (MFIs) seems to follow the negative screening approach, being driven mainly by financial performance and professionalization of the MFIs while subsidized funding seems to follow a positive approach, being driven mainly by targeting poverty alleviation and social inclusion.
Published Version’s DOI: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.