Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/322629 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2003
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Papers Series No. 03-16
Verlag: 
Utrecht University, Utrecht School of Economics, Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute, Utrecht
Zusammenfassung: 
This study shows that the effects of judgment proofness on precaution depend on whether the injurer can reduce the probability of the accident, the magnitude of the harm, or both. Different legal solutions to the problem are examined: punitive damages, average compensation, undercompensation, accurate compensation and negligence. We find that when the injurer can only reduce the probability of the accident, negligence with average compensation is the best solution, but negligence with perfectly compensatory damages is the desirable solution if the injurer can only or also affect the magnitude of the harm.
Schlagwörter: 
insolvency
judgment proof
liability
bankruptcy
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
348.36 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.