Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/322263 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] East Asian Economic Review (EAER) [ISSN:] 2508-1667 [Volume:] 29 [Issue:] 2 [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 139-199
Publisher: 
Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP), Sejong-si
Abstract: 
This study examines two key challenges in services trade research: the reliability of trade data and the measurement of non-tariff barriers, particularly the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI). Using firm-level panel data from Türkiye with fixed effects, we show that international data limitations significantly affect empirical results and that the explanatory power of the gravity model declines with more detailed microdata. We also find that the STRI's link to trade flows is weaker and more sector-specific than assumed, questioning its methodological adequacy. Additionally, ad valorem equivalent (AVE) rates are estimated, revealing moderate barriers for Türkiye's exports but much higher protection in imports, notably in technical services and transport. The findings highlight the need for sector-specific liberalization and call for next-generation STRI indices that are dynamic, firm-responsive, and modular by regulatory dimension. We advocate for cautious interpretation of STRI-based estimates and encourage the use of microdata across countries to improve services trade analysis and policy design.
Subjects: 
Trade in Services
Gravity Model
the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI)
Non-Tariff Barriers
Ad Valorem Equivalents (AVEs)
JEL: 
F13
F14
C23
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.