Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Khalil, Elias L.
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Papers on economics and evolution 0622
Advocates of natural selection usually regard rationality as redundant, i.e., as a mere linguistic device to describe natural selection. But this “Redundancy Thesis” faces the anomaly that rationality differs from natural selection. One solution is to conceive rationality as a trait selected by the neo-Darwinian mechanism of natural selection as . But this “Rationality-qua-Trait Thesis” faces a problem as well: Following neo-Darwinism, one cannot classify one allele of, e.g., eyesight as better than another without reference to constraints—while one can classify rationality as better than irrationality irrespective of constraints. Therefore, natural selection cannot be a trait. This leads us to the only solution: Rationality is actually a method that cannot be reduced to a trait. This “Rationality-qua-Method Thesis” lays the ground for alternative, developmental views of evolution.
Redundancy Thesis
rationality anomaly
Rationality-qua-Trait Thesis
incoherence problem
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
463.61 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.