Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/314154 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Applied Economics [ISSN:] 1667-6726 [Volume:] 25 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 93-120
Publisher: 
Taylor & Francis, Abingdon
Abstract: 
We study the implications of economic policies on household's decisions. We focus on Chile in 2019. Using a life-cycle search model and survey data, we found that an equivalent change in labor tax rates and non-contributory pensions (NCP) have opposite effects on labor markets, specifically on informality and unemployment duration. NCP offers a milder trade-off as it produces a second-order increase in informality. However, due to the presence of informal labor markets and financial frictions, non-retired agents increase their current consumption only after a tax cut. That is, a positive wealth shock can reduce consumption. When we consider the impact on welfare, as households are assumed to value only consumption, cutting taxes seems to be preferred. We characterize labor market and consumption-savings decisions. We found two effects operating in opposite directions: substitution and wealth. The latter prevails suggesting that the life cycle aspects of the labor market are critical.
Subjects: 
life-cycle
Search models
simulation-based estimation
social-security reform
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.